|
Post by Marlins GM (Joey) on Nov 12, 2013 19:41:53 GMT -6
We are suppose to be changing this year from OF, OF, OF to RF, CF, LF.
Is that something we are still on board for this year or should we delay it til 2015?
Personally I am still on board with this being a 2014 change.
|
|
|
Post by Ex-AC - Indians GM on Nov 13, 2013 9:11:16 GMT -6
Change to RF, CF, LF is my preference
|
|
|
Post by Marlins GM (Joey) on Nov 13, 2013 13:23:57 GMT -6
I agree and it could lead to some more trade activity as well.
|
|
|
Post by Marlins GM (Joey) on Nov 19, 2013 20:19:49 GMT -6
Anyone else want to chime in?
|
|
|
Post by Marlins GM (Joey) on Dec 5, 2013 17:21:18 GMT -6
Last chance to chime in.
|
|
|
Post by GM Phillies on Dec 5, 2013 19:39:29 GMT -6
I like it the present way of just three OF's.
|
|
|
Post by Rockies GM (Bob) on Dec 6, 2013 8:21:06 GMT -6
I prefer the 3 OF
|
|
|
Post by Ex-AC - Indians GM on Dec 6, 2013 9:08:07 GMT -6
Having said that LF< CF< RF is my preference, i would not be bothered if it stays the same.
Importantly if we do go LF CF RF we need to be 100% certain on the Position Elig for site we use.
|
|
|
Post by ex-redsoxgm on Dec 6, 2013 10:34:58 GMT -6
It can be daunting enough getting 3 OF slots filled after injuries and demotions etc. This would in reality force people to try and stockpile OF's which is not an easy thing to do in a 28 team /salary cap situation. Ifyour LF goes down what do you do? How realisitic is it to have two startable CF/LF/RF? How many different OF are going to have mulitple eligibilitys, what is going to determine elgibility.
TBH I am in favor for keeping it 3 OF
|
|
|
Post by Red Sox GM on Dec 6, 2013 13:53:02 GMT -6
I say 3 OF, especially considering we have a number of open teams. This would be one less thing for them to worry when trying to rebuild their roster.
|
|
|
Post by metsgm on Dec 6, 2013 14:51:51 GMT -6
In favor of 3 OF especially with all of the new owners in rebuild mode (myself included) not a lot of FA OF options.
|
|
|
Post by Marlins GM (Joey) on Dec 6, 2013 15:04:37 GMT -6
Even if it stays that this year it will change to RF, CF and LF next year (2015). Its a change that is going to take place either this year (2014) or next year (2015). At least that was the plan as of last year anyway maybe we should conduct another poll?
|
|
|
Post by Marlins GM (Joey) on Dec 6, 2013 15:05:37 GMT -6
It can be daunting enough getting 3 OF slots filled after injuries and demotions etc. This would in reality force people to try and stockpile OF's which is not an easy thing to do in a 28 team /salary cap situation. Ifyour LF goes down what do you do? How realisitic is it to have two startable CF/LF/RF? How many different OF are going to have mulitple eligibilitys, what is going to determine elgibility. TBH I am in favor for keeping it 3 OF Most leagues I am in use RF, CF and LF over 3 OF spots it adds realism and strategy.
|
|
|
Post by Marlins GM (Joey) on Dec 6, 2013 15:23:04 GMT -6
In the interest in fairness I added a poll.
|
|
|
Post by Marlins GM (Joey) on Dec 6, 2013 15:26:57 GMT -6
Having said that LF< CF< RF is my preference, i would not be bothered if it stays the same. Importantly if we do go LF CF RF we need to be 100% certain on the Position Elig for site we use. I think this might be standard Games Needed From Prev Year At Hitting Pos (20) Games Needed From Current Year At Hitting Pos (10)
|
|